logo image
  • Microscopy Courses
    • Course Calendar
    • Additional Course Information
    • Directions and Transportation
    • Hotels
  • The Microscope Journal
    • About The Microscope Journal
    • Subscriptions and Renewals
    • Current Issues, Back Issues, Articles
    • Guide for Authors
    • Disclaimer
    • The Microscope Vol. 73:2 2026
    • The Microscope Vol. 73:1 2026
    • The Microscope Vol. 72:4 2025
    • The Microscope Vol. 72:3 2025
    • The Microscope Vol. 72:2 2025
    • The Microscope Vol. 72:1 2025
    • The Microscope Vol. 71:4 2024
    • The Microscope Vol. 71:3 2024
    • The Microscope Vol. 71:2 2024
    • The Microscope Vol. 71:1 2024
    • The Microscope Vol. 70:4 2023
    • The Microscope Vol. 70:3 2023
    • The Microscope Vol. 70:2 2023
    • The Microscope Vol. 70:1 2023
    • The Microscope Vol. 69:4 2022
    • The Microscope Vol. 69:3 2022
    • The Microscope Vol. 69:2 2022
    • The Microscope Vol. 69:1 2022
    • The Microscope Vol. 68:3/4 2020
    • The Microscope Vol. 68:2 2020
    • The Microscope Vol. 68:1 2020
    • The Microscope Vol. 67:4 2019
    • The Microscope Vol. 67:3 2019
    • The Microscope Vol. 67:2 2019
    • The Microscope Vol. 67:1 2019
    • The Microscope Vol. 66:4 2018
    • The Microscope Vol. 66:3 2018
    • The Microscope Vol. 66:2 2018
    • The Microscope Vol. 66:1 2018
    • The Microscope Vol. 65:4 2017
    • The Microscope Vol. 65:3 2017
    • The Microscope Vol. 65:2 2017
    • The Microscope Vol. 65:1 2017
    • The Microscope Vol. 64:4 2016
    • The Microscope Vol. 64:3 2016
    • The Microscope Vol. 64:2 2016
    • The Microscope Vol. 64:1 2016
    • The Microscope Vol. 63:1 2015
    • The Microscope Vol. 63:2 2015
    • The Microscope Vol. 63:3 2015
    • The Microscope Vol. 63:4 2015
    • The Microscope Vol. 62:1 2014
    • The Microscope Vol. 62:2 2014
    • The Microscope Vol. 62:3 2014
    • The Microscope Vol. 62:4 2014
    • The Microscope Vol. 61:1 2013
    • The Microscope Vol. 61:2 2013
  • Publications and Videos
    • Books, Charts, and Graphs
    • The Microscope Journal
    • Videos
  • Inter/Micro Conference
    • Inter/Micro Conference 2027
    • 2027 Abstract Submission Guidelines
    • About Inter/Micro 2026
    • Schedule of Events
    • 2026 Abstracts and Presentation Schedule
    • SMSI Silent Auction
    • SMSI Awards Dinner
    • Company Sponsors 2026
    • Photomicrography Competition
    • Workshop: Microscopical ID of Sand
    • Exhibitor & Sponsor Registration
    • Directions and Transportation
    • Hotels
  • Research
    • Analytical Laboratory Research
    • The Vinland Map
    • Shroud of Turin Research at McCrone
    • The Latest McCrone Shroud Update
    • Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum Theft
    • About Research at McCrone
  • About
    • Students and Clients A-Z
    • About Lucy B. McCrone
    • About Walter C. McCrone
    • Contact
    • Privacy and Other Policies
  • 61-2 Microscope A Lost Poem by Louis
image

Calculated Nominal Ranges of Refractive Indices for the Amphiboles Found in the Rainy Creek Igneous Complex


THE MICROSCOPE
2013, Volume 61:2, pp. 75–84
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59082/LFFD1588
AUTHORS
Matthew S. Sanchez and Mickey E. Gunter
ABSTRACT
The amphiboles occurring in the Rainy Creek Igneous Complex (RCC) near Libby, Montana, range in composition such that the following amphibole species have been identified: tremolite, winchite, richterite, magnesioriebeckite and magnesioarfvedsonite. The composition, optical and crystallographic values of only winchite and richterite have been determined. In an attempt to characterize the nominal (i.e. mean) refractive index for tremolite, magnesioriebeckite and magnesioarfvedsonite species, derivations of Gladstone-Dale constants specific to the RCC were attempted. It was not possible to obtain specific Gladstone-Dale constants using these data for the RCC amphiboles. Therefore, the Gladstone-Dale constants derived by Jaffe (1) for the alkali amphiboles were applied to the published electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) data from Meeker et al. (2) specific to tremolite and magnesioriebeckite, as well as the data from Sanchez et al. (3) for magnesioarfvedsonite. (Note: Dyar and Gunter [4], and references therein provide more information on amphibole nomenclature and correlations of refractive indices to mineral structures.) The range of nominal refractive indices for the tremolite, magnesioriebeckite and magnesioarfvedsonite are calculated as n=1.610 to 1.629, n=1.646 to 1.665 and n=1.641 to 1.652, respectively. The nominal range of refractive indices for the amphiboles occurring within the RCC is much smaller than the ranges for amphiboles under current International Mineralogical Association nomenclature for magnesioarfvedsonite and magnesioriebeckite and their solid solutions. Therefore, caution is required when using the optical properties.
Subscribe to The Microscope
McCrone Research Institute
A Not-for-Profit Corporation
2820 South Michigan AvenueChicago, IL 60616-3230 (312) 842-7100
Copyright © 2026 McCrone Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

We use cookies to enable essential functionality on our website, and analyze website traffic. By clicking Accept you consent to our use of cookies. Cookies and Privacy Policy.