• Course Calendar
    • Course Calendar
    • Additional Course Information
    • Directions and Transportation
    • Hotels
  • The Microscope Journal
    • About The Microscope Journal
    • Subscriptions and Renewals
    • Current Issues, Back Issues, Articles
    • Guide for Authors
    • Disclaimer
    • The Microscope Vol. 73:2 2026
    • The Microscope Vol. 73:1 2026
    • The Microscope Vol. 72:4 2025
    • The Microscope Vol. 72:3 2025
    • The Microscope Vol. 72:2 2025
    • The Microscope Vol. 72:1 2025
    • The Microscope Vol. 71:4 2024
    • The Microscope Vol. 71:3 2024
    • The Microscope Vol. 71:2 2024
    • The Microscope Vol. 71:1 2024
    • The Microscope Vol. 70:4 2023
    • The Microscope Vol. 70:3 2023
    • The Microscope Vol. 70:2 2023
    • The Microscope Vol. 70:1 2023
    • The Microscope Vol. 69:4 2022
    • The Microscope Vol. 69:3 2022
    • The Microscope Vol. 69:2 2022
    • The Microscope Vol. 69:1 2022
    • The Microscope Vol. 68:3/4 2020
    • The Microscope Vol. 68:2 2020
    • The Microscope Vol. 68:1 2020
    • The Microscope Vol. 67:4 2019
    • The Microscope Vol. 67:3 2019
    • The Microscope Vol. 67:2 2019
    • The Microscope Vol. 67:1 2019
    • The Microscope Vol. 66:4 2018
    • The Microscope Vol. 66:3 2018
    • The Microscope Vol. 66:2 2018
    • The Microscope Vol. 66:1 2018
    • The Microscope Vol. 65:4 2017
    • The Microscope Vol. 65:3 2017
    • The Microscope Vol. 65:2 2017
    • The Microscope Vol. 65:1 2017
    • The Microscope Vol. 64:4 2016
    • The Microscope Vol. 64:3 2016
    • The Microscope Vol. 64:2 2016
    • The Microscope Vol. 64:1 2016
    • The Microscope Vol. 63:1 2015
    • The Microscope Vol. 63:2 2015
    • The Microscope Vol. 63:3 2015
    • The Microscope Vol. 63:4 2015
  • Publications and Videos
    • Books, Charts, and Graphs
    • The Microscope Journal
    • Videos
  • Inter/Micro Conference
    • Inter/Micro Conference 2027
    • 2027 Abstract Submission Guidelines
    • About Inter/Micro 2026
    • Schedule of Events
    • 2026 Abstracts and Presentation Schedule
    • SMSI Silent Auction
    • SMSI Awards Dinner
    • Company Sponsors 2026
    • Photomicrography Competition
    • Workshop: Microscopical ID of Sand
    • Exhibitor & Sponsor Registration
    • Directions and Transportation
    • Hotels
  • Research
    • Analytical Laboratory Research
    • The Vinland Map
    • Shroud of Turin Research at McCrone
    • The Latest McCrone Shroud Update
    • Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum Theft
    • About Research at McCrone
  • About
    • Students and Clients A-Z
    • About Lucy B. McCrone
    • About Walter C. McCrone
    • Contact
    • Privacy and Other Policies

Analytical Approach for Identification of the Zeolite Erionite

THE MICROSCOPE
2015, Volume 63:4, pp. 161–171
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59082/RCMW2972
AUTHORS
Kristina P. Pourtabib and Mickey E. Gunter
ABSTRACT
The need for precise identification of the fibrous/acicular zeolite mineral erionite has become increasingly important due to erionite’s ties to mesothelioma in Turkey and to lung disease in western North America (1). The regulatory community struggles to unambiguously identify asbestiform minerals when they occur in natural rather than built environments. Zeolites present an even more unique set of problems due to the similar cation content and crystal structure observed between different zeolite species such as erionite and offretite. Currently, there is a lack of regulatory methods for accurately identifying erionite particles in nature. We tested a variety of techniques that can be applied for the identification of erionite, including the use of selected area electron diffraction (SAED) with transmission electron microscopy (TEM), indirect zeolite identification with polarized light microscopy (PLM), and powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) for analysis of bulk composition. We found that smaller TEM-scale data provides paramount structural information in the form of diffraction patterns because erionite shows systematic absences (i.e., diffraction constraints) along uv0 of 00l = 2n due to its space group symmetry, while the other zeolites in this study will show different diffraction constraints along c*, and different repeats in c (2). We have shown that by using a combination of scale-dependent identification methods, such as TEM, PLM and XRD, these zeolites can be accurately distinguished from one another with sufficient care.
Subscribe to The Microscope
McCrone Research Institute
A Not-for-Profit Corporation
2820 South Michigan AvenueChicago, IL 60616-3230 (312) 842-7100
Copyright © 2026 McCrone Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

We use cookies to enable essential functionality on our website, and analyze website traffic. By clicking Accept you consent to our use of cookies. Cookies and Privacy Policy.

Your Cookie Settings

We use cookies to enable essential functionality on our website and analyze website traffic. For more information, read our Cookies and Privacy Policy below..

Cookie Categories
Essential

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our websites.

Analytics

These cookies collect information that is used in aggregate and in an anonymized form to help us understand how our website is being used and how effectively our site is performing.